Media & Videos
Browse Neutrality Studies lectures, interviews, and talks.
- It is OVER: The West Destroys Itself. Final Words. | Tord Björk
Tord Björk argues that the Helsinki Final Act’s historic success rested on broad, cross-class popular mobilization—peace, human rights, and friendship networks—not solely state diplomacy. He traces how post‑Cold War economic choices and professionalization fragmented social movements, enabling the e
- MASSIVE Escalation: USA Plans Nuke Attack, Prepares Troops | Steven Starr
Steven Starr warns that current military shortages and revised U.S. nuclear doctrine are lowering the threshold for nuclear use, increasing the risk of tactical and then full-scale nuclear escalation. He outlines dwindling precision conventional munitions, continued reliance on diverse tactical warh
- Deterrence Psychopathy Highjacks Europe—It's Getting Worse | Cdre. Steve Jermy
Retired Commodore Steve Jermy argues that European security has been hijacked by a deterrence mindset that risks escalating the NATO–Russia conflict into a much wider, devastating war. He traces the war’s antecedents to NATO expansion and criticizes Western strategic complacency, weak air defenses,
- US Empire Defeated: Multipolarity Wins Against Colonial West | Dr Kee Beng Ooi
Dr. Ooi Kee Beng contends that the contemporary international order is shifting toward multipolarity driven by economic change, decolonization legacies, and the resurgence of non‑Western agency. He argues Southeast Asia feels hopeful because rising regional economies—especially China—and enduring pl
- NATO's Plans for Total Global Dominance & The Bunker State | Nel Bonilla
Nel Bonilla develops the “bunker state” framework to describe a qualitative transformation of Western states from welfare providers into securitized, militarized nodes oriented to perpetual hybrid warfare. She argues NATO 3.0 institutionalizes this shift by deepening military integration across Euro
- Eurasia Breaks USA: Three Front Defeat Forming | Prof. Radhika Desai
Radhika Desai argues that current geopolitical shifts reflect deeper structural failures of neoliberal political economy and the dollar system. She sees South Korea’s recent peace initiative and Trump’s troop rhetoric as symptomatic of declining trust in the U.S. security umbrella, driven by U.S. mi
- 🚨ESCALATION: Trade War Gets Worse, Iran War Extends to Ukraine | Stas Krapivnik
Stanislav Krapivnik assesses shifting Middle East alignments and their spillover into the Black Sea and Ukraine wars, arguing the reported Turkey–Pakistan–Saudi axis is largely transactional and unlikely to confront Iran decisively. He notes internal frictions—sectarian demographics in Pakistan, Kur
- Iran War Round 3: Tehran Prepares Knock-Out Blow | Prof. S.M. Marandi
Professor S.M. Marandi contends that Iran is transitioning from immediate retaliation to preparing a decisive, long-term deterrent against future US-led attacks. He portrays daily life in Tehran as outwardly normal despite significant economic strain from sanctions, naval blockades, and targeted str
- NATO's Terrible Mistake: Proxy-War Turns Against Europe | Anatol Lieven
At the heart of this exchange, Anatol Lieven argues that NATO’s prolonged proxy war in Ukraine is increasingly backfiring on Europe, creating strategic deadlock and political strain. He contends that Russian red lines—especially preventing NATO membership for Ukraine—remain central and that European
- China Shocks USA: The Fight Is Already Over | Prof. Wang Wen
Professor Wang Wen argues that China’s strategic posture centers on domestic strength and systemic resilience rather than seeking to supplant the United States. He contends that Trump 2.0’s transactional pressures accelerated Chinese self-reliance—spurring advances in semiconductors, green energy, A
- The REAL Reason Peace in Ukraine is Impossible | Pavel Shchelin
- End of NATO Hegemony: New Alliance "Nothing Burger" Exposes Western Weakness
Pascal argues that the new pact among Turkey, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia is largely "alliance theater"—a political signal more than a binding security guarantee. He highlights the absence of a published treaty text, compares likely vague wording to NATO’s non‑automatic Article 5, and contrasts that